A fter an across the country crackdown on boys whom buy sex within the 8th National Day of Johns Arrests earlier on recently, comedian Jim Norton wrote an article saying his directly to pay prostitutes for gender, called a€?In Defense of Johns.a€?
Dona€™t get me wrong, Norton is actually classic slots a funny guy. And Ia€™m all for comedians driving the social limitations in stand-up, because thata€™s exactly what funny is focused on. But exactly why cana€™t a famous comic like him find a person that desires make love with your for their apperance and sparkling identity?
Nortona€™s essay wasna€™t a joke a€” it was a genuine debate defending the right to purchase gender. a€?yet, probably the more shameful thing I’m able to admit so is this: Ia€™m certainly not uncomfortable,a€? the guy blogged. a€?And neither should some of these more (unmarried) johns who have been arrested.a€?
Really, Jim, you ought to be uncomfortable to fund sex. Therefore should all the other males just who buy ladies and ladies, a lot of who have already been trafficked, enslaved and over and over raped. No amount of rationalization will get around the fundamental idea of markets economics: if everyone as if you didna€™t pick women, they’dna€™t feel sold, of course, if they were able tona€™t getting ended up selling, they willna€™t be trafficked and abused.
(however, there are women who purchase intercourse, and plenty of boys and males that trafficking victims, but leta€™s focus on the male-client/female-sex-worker argument that Norton is certian with.)
There seemed to be one part of Nortona€™s article that used to do get a hold of amusing.